More Planning Success at Moor Monkton

Northern Planners have done it again. We have just won planning permission for the conversion and extension of a large outbuilding to residential use at Wheatsheaf Farm, Church Lane, Moor Monkton. This has been a challenge as Council Officers initially resisted the proposals alleging overshadowing, overbearing and overlooking effects and stability issues. Senior Planner, Amy Naylor explains:

‘We had to withdraw the original Application in order to undertake assessments to prove to the Council that their concerns were unfounded. Whilst time consuming, this approach has yielded the right result.’

One of the assessments was a Daylight and Sunlight Assessment to gauge the pre and post development levels of light, undertaken in-house by the Northern Planners Team. We are able to secure a whole range of reports of this type to provide the evidence necessary to refute the spurious claims of Councils and objectively show that development is acceptable. The Moor Monkton consent is particularly satisfying as the village is not one earmarked for housing.


Eye of Newt and wing of Bat for a Charm of Powerful (Winter) Trouble

Apologies to Shakespeare but as we head past Halloween and further into Autumn, the changing seasons can begin to play potential havoc with the programming of client’s development projects.

This is because, some projects might have consequences for wildlife and Councils may ask for ecological surveys that can’t be carried out until Spring/Summer.

Here at Northern Planners we take a pragmatic approach to this problem. We know that delaying a project can have major implications for our clients.

Bats can be an issue in relation to barn conversions for example (see ‘Q Class Conversions for Agricultural Buildings – Some Pitfalls’ article elsewhere on this blog). Newts may be suspected if a pond is nearby a development site.

Indeed, Newts are a modern bête-noire in planning and development, so much so that the Government is currently running a pilot project to test district-level licensing for Great Crested Newts. This strategic approach is experimenting with replacing site-by-site licensing with a new system of authority-wide licensing, with surveys and habitat compensation undertaken proactively at the district level by Natural England and the local authority. Time will tell if this approach will work and be any better than the current set-up.

We have often thought that wildlife conservation in planning should work along the following (common sense) lines:

  • The Council should provide a decent rationale to the Applicant that there is a reasonable likelihood that a species is present.
  • The Applicant should automatically be able to adopt the ‘worse-case’ scenario i.e. it is assumed that the species are there, without having to fund expensive surveys or surveys that can’t actually be undertaken due to seasonal constraints.
  • A full mitigation approach should be adopted by the Applicant and accepted by the Council.
  • Planning permission should require the mitigation measures to be implemented in full.
  • The Applicant can subsequently carry out surveys if they wish/when the time is appropriate and ask for the mitigation measures to be waived or amended based on this evidence.



Halving the Affordable Housing Requirement








Each month we take a look at a recent significant local appeal decision to see what can be learnt and potentially applied to other cases. This time it is the turn of a 103-home scheme at Moorview Way in Skipton.

Inspector Anne Jordon thought that a developer’s profit level of between 18% and 19% would be sustainable in this case and that in relation to viability the development would be capable of sustaining the delivery of 40% affordable housing on site. However, she concluded that the Council’s demands for a 40% element of affordable housing could not be supported because there was no Local Plan policy to back it up. It didn’t help the Council either that their Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPD) document “Negotiating Affordable Housing Contributions August 2016”, had been the subject of a legal challenge and had been quashed by the High Court. Inspector Jordon accepted the developer’s unilateral offer of 20% affordable housing instead.

Another Tool for Better Planning – Greenspace mapping


The Ordnance Survey made some useful planning information freely available recently in the form of its ‘Open Greenspace’ dataset. This data includes all accessible leisure and recreational spaces in Britain’s towns and countryside, including golf courses, parks, playspaces, allotments, etc.. Such information is valuable for helping assess the sustainability of development locations.


Needless to say Northern Planners have added this information to its in-house Geographical Information System (GIS) which we use to evaluate the planning sensitivities/attributes of potential sites.


Our Landscape Architect and GIS Expert, Kate Weller said:

‘This is a great addition to our planning knowledge base for appraising the assets and liabilities of different sites. Our GIS system is a powerful resource to quickly and cost-effectively assess if development would be sustainable, and therefore likely to obtain planning permission. GIS data is a fundamental input to all our clients’ projects.’

Past the Duchy

Past the Duchy, on the left hand side…an insight into the Cornwall Road refusal

Sometimes consent isn’t forthcoming but even so, the decision itself can be helpful in other respects. Take for example last month’s refusal of a 165 house scheme at Cornwall Road, Harrogate, on countryside land west of the Duchy Estate (not one of ours). In his Decision Letter to the Appellants of 6th September, the Duchy of Lancaster (i.e. Her Royal Highness the Queen of the UK etc.), the Inspector Mr Keith Manning provided useful commentary on the out-of-date nature of the Borough Council’s Development Plan policies and the current housing land supply position across the District. He noted that:

‘the Council cannot currently demonstrate a five year supply of deliverable housing sites and that the supply in fact stands at around 4 years’

‘It is also common ground that the development limits shown in the Local Plan are out-of-date and “carry no weight”.’

‘It is a matter of fact that planning permissions for housing on greenfield sites outside these limits have been variously granted by the Council at first instance and on appeal’

‘Policy C2 of the Local Plan simply seeks to protect landscape character and taken literally would be prohibitive of development unless restoration of the landscape, where necessary, were a consequence. Insofar as it could be construed as somewhat absolute in effect it is not entirely consistent with the Framework and merits reduced weight accordingly.’ (‘Framework’ being the National Planning Policy Framework.)

‘There is a pressing need to release land for housing, to which I of course accord substantial weight. The social consequences of an inadequate housing supply, especially of affordable housing, are of particular concern.’

‘The emerging Harrogate Local Plan is at an early stage of preparation and it is common ground that it is therefore of limited weight.’

Northern Planners have advanced these points in relation to schemes we have been involved, in and around the District’s settlements e.g. at Scotton where we have consistently had success in gaining planning permission for clients for housing outside the traditional development limits.


A Fair Settlement?

A fair settlement? An insight into the Thorpe Arch Trading Estate settlement proposal

It will be interesting to see the outcome of another major scheme that is currently at appeal, this time at Thorpe Arch Trading Estate (TATE), Wetherby. The Public Inquiry for a new village in this location was suspended this month and will reopen in November. Northern Planners initially advised the local Parish Council on its position with respect to the Planning Application. The Inquiry into the redevelopment of this former World War II Ordnance Factory site has been wide ranging looking at housing land supply, contamination, heritage, biodiversity, design, transport and viability issues. A new settlement at TATE would certainly change the geography of this part of Leeds City Council’s patch. Not everyone locally welcomes that!


Weighing it all up

As with all planning judgments, the Inspector at the TATE Inquiry will have to see if the benefits of the proposed development outweigh its disbenefits (or costs). It is interesting to see that, leading Think Tank, the Institute for Government, last month published new research into the technique of formal cost benefit analysis as applied to large infrastructure projects like HS2 and Hinckley Point. The Institute’s report, ‘How to Value Infrastructure: Improving Cost Benefit Analysis’ notes the over optimism of many cost forecasts and the tendency of public sector projects to overrun by millions of pounds. It also notes the unwillingness of project promoters to undertake post development evaluations of whether or not things turn out as rosy as predicted. Well worth a look!


National Planning Changes Consultation

Also out last month, for consultation is the Government’s proposals for how Council’s should calculate local need for different types of housing, getting Councils to cooperate properly with each other when making Local Plans, improving the use of Section 106 planning agreements and allowing better performing Councils to increase their Planning Application Fees. On planning agreements the Government’s proposal is that the National Planning Policy Framework will be amended to clarify that where policy requirements have been tested for their viability in a Local Plan, the issue should not usually need to be tested again at the planning application stage. A possible 20% increase in Planning Application Fees is being mooted for Councils that deliver the homes that their areas need. The consultation is seeking views on the detailed criteria on how this should be judged. The deadline for views on ‘Planning for the Right Homes in the Right Places’ ends on 9th November.

Our Recent Successes

From the Planning ‘Oscars’ in Hullywood

 Firstly to this year’s regional planning awards presided over by the Yorkshire Branch of the Royal Town Planning Institute, in Hull on 14th September. Our Senior Planner colleague, David Hickling was mentioned in despatches for his professional contribution to the Cottingham Neighbourhood Plan. He worked alongside Integreat Plus to put together the Plan which received a commendation from the Judging Panel. The Judges said:

This is a high quality and comprehensive Neighbourhood Plan, containing an impressive amount of professional input, including a Design Guide, and Development Principles for allocated sites, and it is clear that significant efforts have been expended in consulting with, and ensuring participation by, local people. This process has resulted in an outstanding example of neighbourhood planning, in which the content can be shown to have been derived from local needs and aspirations.  It should be regarded as a level to which other neighbourhood plans should aspire.’

David, is delighted to have helped mould the community’s ideas into viable planning proposals. Modest as ever, he commented thus on his accolade:

‘It’s great for our efforts to be acknowledged in this way. Good plans make for good planning decisions on applications and ensure new development is sustainable and embraced by local people. This award from our peers is a hallmark of quality planning advice.’

 We are also currently working with Integreat Plus to assist residents of Oxenhope, Bradford with their emerging Neighbourhood Plan. They are obviously in good hands!


Local Industrial Estate to host National Research Project

Also, last month Northern Planners have won permission for premises at Copgrove Industrial Estate, nearby Knaresborough to be used to test a new breed of electricity pylons. The project is part of a major, Ofgem-funded initiative to improve the look of these structures and reduce their impact on the environment. The new designs will be based on monopoles rather than the traditional lattice-type pylons.


Our Senior Planner, Amy Naylor led the work and had this to say:

‘This project will change the future appearance of powerlines and better protect the British landscape. We have worked closely with Harrogate Borough Council to address all the key issues for the development at Copgrove and we are delighted to have securing the consent.’

Selby Council is looking for development sites!

Selby District Council is looking for local landowners and developers to put forward land/buildings suitable for future development.

The period for putting forward your sites runs from the beginning of October until late November.

Northern Planners are well-placed to promote our clients’ sites as part of this exercise. With experienced Policy Planners in our team, we know the Council’s preferred selection criteria and are able to use our planning skills to ensure a good match.


Helen Gregory, the Council’s Planning Policy Manager has told us ‘this is the last opportunity to suggest new sites’ before the Plan is finalised.


Get in touch today to see how we can advance the development potential of your assets in Selby’s Local Plan process.

Knaresborough’s Neighbourhood Development Plan

This week Knaresborough Town Council published a draft version of the new Neighborhood Development Plan.

If this plan is adopted it will become a legal document which will be consulted for all planning applications until 2035. 

The next seven weeks are designated as a formal public consultation period. This is an opportunity for all members of the community to have a say on the future of Knaresborough.

If you would like to drop into one of these local consultation sessions, the dates (along with the proposal document) can be found using the link below:

We have also posted this useful flowchart illustrating the next steps in the Neighbourhood Planning process following consultation.


Ways to beat the system, or just plain crazy?

  1. Dwellings in the countryside

For many people, the idea of building their own home in the countryside is a dream which often unfortunately fails become a reality. The restrictions of national and local planning policy are usually some of the reasons why.

Paragraph 55 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that local planning authorities should avoid new isolated homes in the countryside unless there are ‘special circumstances’. These circumstances include the exceptional quality or innovative nature of the design of the dwelling. This is national policy; it’s in the name.

But is there a way around this? One Appellant based in Essex has certainly found a way!

In brief, a Planning Inspector recently allowed an isolated dwelling in the countryside after determining that the dwelling’s design (which comprised a two-bed chalet style dwelling constructed from straw bales) was locally innovative. He recorded that the council had not directed him to any similar projects locally where the simple method of straw bale construction had been employed as part of an overall design philosophy. Accordingly, he found that the overall project was locally innovative and had the potential to raise the environmental standards and diversity of design in the vicinity.

There is, of course, nothing specifically in paragraph 55 of the NPPF which states that the ‘exceptional quality or innovative nature of the design’ test is set at a national level.

This case lowers the bar than previously thought.

(Article source: DCP online)

(Photo source:


2. Extensions via Permitted Development

Many of us know that there are certain modifications we can do to our house without the need for planning permission, such as side and rear extensions. This is what is known as Permitted Development.

However, there are certain restrictions to this, one of which includes that an extension would not be Permitted Development if ‘the enlarged part of the dwellinghouse would extend beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse and have a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse’

Interestingly though, an Appellant has recently convinced an inspector that a side extension and a rear extension to his house in north London are permitted development because there would be a 5mm gap between them.

The inspector accepted that if the two elements were joined, then the proposed extensions could not be classed as Permitted Development. He reasoned, however, that the proposal indicated that there would be a gap, and the practicalities of constructing the proposal were not a matter for him to consider

Even we’re struggling to understand this one!

(Source: DCP online)